California evidence atlas · July 2024 snapshot
Where California psychiatry access thins out.
This county view compares listed psychiatrist headcount, population, and Medi-Cal enrollment from dated sources. It is a directional planning aid—not a current provider directory, network-adequacy determination, causal analysis, or forecast of appointment access.
Study 01 / 58 counties / historical snapshot
County evidence ledger
Sources: NPI Registry, CHCF, DHCS, and California Department of Finance. July 2024 source data; extraction and limitations are detailed below.
Click a county on the map to view details
All counties — sortable data
| County ▲ | Population ▲ | Psychiatrists ▲ | Per 100k ▲ | Medi-Cal enrolled ▲ | Medi-Cal % ▼ | MC per psychiatrist ▲ | Phase ▲ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulare | 476,356 | 23 | 4.8 | 300,659 | 63.1% | 13,072 | 2 |
| Imperial | 181,060 | 8 | 4.4 | 100,782 | 55.7% | 12,598 | 2 |
| Kern | 904,430 | 47 | 5.2 | 488,311 | 54% | 10,390 | 2 |
| Fresno | 1,014,946 | 88 | 8.7 | 546,102 | 53.8% | 6,206 | 2 |
| Lake | 65,908 | 3 | 4.6 | 35,417 | 53.7% | 11,806 | 2 |
| Merced | 286,149 | 14 | 4.9 | 153,747 | 53.7% | 10,982 | 2 |
| Madera | 159,786 | 6 | 3.8 | 83,961 | 52.5% | 13,994 | 2 |
| Glenn | 27,739 | 1 | 3.6 | 13,826 | 49.8% | 13,826 | 2 |
| Del Norte | 26,021 | 2 | 7.7 | 12,735 | 48.9% | 6,368 | 2 |
| Mendocino | 88,991 | 8 | 9 | 43,376 | 48.7% | 5,422 | 2 |
| Tehama | 64,440 | 2 | 3.1 | 31,380 | 48.7% | 15,690 | 2 |
| Colusa | 21,939 | 0 | 0 | 10,667 | 48.6% | — | 2 |
| Stanislaus | 544,160 | 27 | 5 | 260,447 | 47.9% | 9,646 | 2 |
| Sutter | 98,330 | 7 | 7.1 | 46,399 | 47.2% | 6,628 | 2 |
| Yuba | 84,086 | 3 | 3.6 | 38,921 | 46.3% | 12,974 | 2 |
| Monterey | 438,851 | 42 | 9.6 | 199,353 | 45.4% | 4,747 | 2 |
| San Bernardino | 2,180,503 | 120 | 5.5 | 987,371 | 45.3% | 8,228 | 2 |
| Humboldt | 134,408 | 16 | 11.9 | 60,695 | 45.2% | 3,793 | 1 |
| Modoc | 8,412 | 0 | 0 | 3,789 | 45% | — | 2 |
| Siskiyou | 42,665 | 3 | 7 | 19,139 | 44.9% | 6,380 | 2 |
| Kings | 153,709 | 5 | 3.3 | 68,004 | 44.2% | 13,601 | 2 |
| Butte | 205,517 | 21 | 10.2 | 86,866 | 42.3% | 4,136 | 1 |
| Riverside | 2,441,474 | 145 | 5.9 | 1,027,163 | 42.1% | 7,084 | 2 |
| Los Angeles | 9,784,023 | 2450 | 25 | 4,108,441 | 42% | 1,677 | 1 |
| Sacramento | 1,588,656 | 270 | 17 | 653,288 | 41.1% | 2,420 | 1 |
| San Joaquin | 787,365 | 38 | 4.8 | 323,476 | 41.1% | 8,513 | 2 |
| Santa Barbara | 446,729 | 58 | 13 | 179,873 | 40.3% | 3,101 | 1 |
| Shasta | 178,300 | 14 | 7.9 | 70,131 | 39.3% | 5,009 | 2 |
| Trinity | 15,823 | 0 | 0 | 5,896 | 37.3% | — | 2 |
| Mariposa | 16,780 | 1 | 6 | 6,066 | 36.2% | 6,066 | 2 |
| Lassen | 27,483 | 1 | 3.6 | 9,247 | 33.6% | 9,247 | 3 |
| San Benito | 65,022 | 2 | 3.1 | 21,597 | 33.2% | 10,799 | 3 |
| Solano | 446,932 | 31 | 6.9 | 148,129 | 33.1% | 4,778 | 3 |
| Ventura | 825,322 | 95 | 11.5 | 269,163 | 32.6% | 2,833 | 3 |
| Plumas | 18,709 | 1 | 5.3 | 6,056 | 32.4% | 6,056 | 3 |
| Orange | 3,142,387 | 550 | 17.5 | 1,015,634 | 32.3% | 1,847 | 3 |
| San Diego | 3,310,718 | 620 | 18.7 | 1,051,288 | 31.8% | 1,696 | 3 |
| Calaveras | 44,483 | 1 | 2.2 | 14,088 | 31.7% | 14,088 | 3 |
| Santa Cruz | 261,708 | 32 | 12.2 | 83,078 | 31.7% | 2,596 | 3 |
| Alameda | 1,654,334 | 289 | 17.5 | 502,349 | 30.4% | 1,738 | 1 |
| San Francisco | 850,147 | 450 | 52.9 | 254,723 | 30% | 566 | 1 |
| Sonoma | 478,459 | 68 | 14.2 | 143,432 | 30% | 2,109 | 3 |
| Inyo | 18,656 | 1 | 5.4 | 5,579 | 29.9% | 5,579 | 3 |
| Nevada | 99,875 | 12 | 12 | 29,757 | 29.8% | 2,480 | 3 |
| Contra Costa | 1,143,037 | 192 | 16.8 | 334,637 | 29.3% | 1,743 | 1 |
| Tuolumne | 53,458 | 4 | 7.5 | 15,556 | 29.1% | 3,889 | 3 |
| Yolo | 220,325 | 18 | 8.2 | 62,145 | 28.2% | 3,453 | 3 |
| Alpine | 1,163 | 0 | 0 | 323 | 27.8% | — | 3 |
| Napa | 133,989 | 22 | 16.4 | 36,365 | 27.1% | 1,653 | 3 |
| Sierra | 3,133 | 0 | 0 | 818 | 26.1% | — | 3 |
| Mono | 13,215 | 1 | 7.6 | 3,423 | 25.9% | 3,423 | 3 |
| San Luis Obispo | 280,437 | 30 | 10.7 | 69,066 | 24.6% | 2,302 | 3 |
| Santa Clara | 1,917,472 | 360 | 18.8 | 471,282 | 24.6% | 1,309 | 1 |
| Amador | 40,198 | 3 | 7.5 | 9,421 | 23.4% | 3,140 | 3 |
| San Mateo | 747,719 | 155 | 20.7 | 171,322 | 22.9% | 1,105 | 1 |
| El Dorado | 186,622 | 16 | 8.6 | 42,454 | 22.7% | 2,653 | 3 |
| Marin | 254,283 | 93 | 36.6 | 56,337 | 22.2% | 606 | 3 |
| Placer | 412,892 | 35 | 8.5 | 81,836 | 19.8% | 2,338 | 3 |
Interpretation / limits first
A planning question—not a causal answer.
The July 2024 snapshot shows uneven listed headcount alongside uneven Medi-Cal enrollment. It cannot show which clinicians accept Medi-Cal, have appointments available, participate in a specific network, or what caused any observed pattern.
Clinician-led model
TalkDoc supports psychiatrists who practice through independently owned Professional Corporations (P.C.s). Administrative services are intended to reduce friction; they do not guarantee capacity or outcomes.
Clinical coaching
Active mentorship and peer-to-peer coaching can support learning and review. Any effect on care quality or outcomes requires defined measures and evidence.
Medicaid operations
TalkDoc's operational focus includes credentialing, billing, and compliance support. Scope, timing, economics, and plan requirements vary by relationship.
Potential value / bounded language
What the model is designed to support.
For clinicians
- Clinical independence: Licensed clinicians retain professional judgment within legal, ethical, and contractual duties.
- Clinical support: Access to peers and coaching intended to support reflection and practice.
- Medicaid focus: An opportunity to serve Medicaid populations; volume, economics, and results are not guaranteed.
For Health Plans
- Network planning: Historical county patterns can inform diligence, but do not establish current adequacy or appointment availability.
- Outcome accountability: Define measures, denominators, and review methods; no clinical result is promised by this model or dataset.
- Coordinated relationship: One operational interface while plan, professional-entity, and clinician responsibilities remain distinct.
Roadmap / conditional
Validate each move before calling it a blueprint.
This historical snapshot is one input to planning. Market decisions require current provider participation, appointment capacity, member need, contracting, operations, and measured implementation evidence.
Study group 1: evaluate
Compare selected urban markets against current supply, demand, contracts, and actual appointment capacity.
Study group 2: test
Assess operational fit in selected higher-enrollment, lower-listed-density counties only after current validation.
Later: assess separately
Consider other states only if measured California implementation holds and each market receives its own diligence.